For a long time, society has viewed many aspects of life through the lens of gender. This perception has often influenced how individuals are expected to behave, their roles, and even how they are treated in various contexts. Being the societally perceived “weaker gender” women have often experienced poorer outcomes as far as these biases are concerned. Before now, news outlets have reported unbalanced pay, limited representation in leadership roles, and unequal access to opportunities in various male-dominated fields. However, it is worth noting that these perceptions do not always favor men. A recent 2024 study observed that because women are perceived to be relatively weaker than men, society often views harm to them as more severe while harm towards men is often minimized or even dismissed.
Key Insights from the Study on Gendered Harm Perception
The study by authors Maja Graso and Tania Reynolds explored how gender influences societal perceptions of harm and victimization, the roots of this bias, and its implications. Published in the scientific journal “Biology Letters,” the research highlights the societal tendency to perceive harm toward women as more severe compared to similar harm against men. Unfortunately, this “feminine advantage” is not without disadvantages for men, the overlooked gender in this case, as the study notes. The study suggested that this bias often results in harm toward men being overlooked, dismissed, or trivialized. Consequently, in areas such as intimate partner violence or workplace misconduct, a man may feel reluctant to seek help or acknowledge their own victimization as this “cry for help” would not be taken seriously.
Why Do Gendered Harm Perceptions Exist?
Exploring the origins of this bias, the study authors uncovered something quite interesting. They observed that evolutionary pressure may have played a role in shaping these perceptions. You see, throughout human history, women’s crucial role in reproduction has made them key to the survival of communities. This led to social structures that prioritized the protection of women to ensure the continuation of the group. Over time, this historical bias toward safeguarding women has evolved into a deeply ingrained cultural norm that continues to influence modern perceptions of harm. For example, the researchers reported that several experiments reviewed by their study observed that people were more willing to sacrifice men than women in hypothetical moral dilemmas. Interestingly, this was truer particularly when the women in question were of reproductive age.
Read Also: Significantly More Female Psychopaths Go Undetected Due to Male-Centric Definitions of Psychopathy
This bias is compounded even further by cognitive factors like moral typecasting which associates women with vulnerability and men with self-sufficiency. Consequently, society often views the female gender as victims and the male gender as perpetrators, or even worse, as a gender able to endure harm without significant consequences.
Additionally, the study pointed out the role of cultural movements advocating women’s rights and gender equality as another contributor to this bias. The study revealed that these movements, while instrumental in advancing awareness of the challenges faced by women, have also contributed to an overemphasis on their vulnerability. Male victimization, in contrast, often remains underreported or downplayed, leaving men with fewer societal or institutional platforms or supports to address their experiences of harm.
FAQs
How does the media affect these perceptions?
Because media representation often shapes public opinion, highlighting one gender’s vulnerability over the other can perpetuate stereotypes about harm and victimization. Consequently, relative overreporting of women victimization which has become common, reinforces the perception of women as more vulnerable, while harm toward men often goes unnoticed or unaddressed.
Does this study imply that harm toward women should be taken less seriously?
No, the study does not suggest that harm toward women should be downplayed. Instead, it highlights the need for a more balanced perspective that ensures all individuals, regardless of gender, receive appropriate attention and support when harmed.
Conclusion
Society’s perceptions of harm and victimization, viewed through the lens of gender, reveal a deeply ingrained bias related to how men and women are treated in situations of adversity. While there is no doubt that the intention of this bias may stem from an instinctual or cultural drive to safeguard the perceived vulnerability of women, it unintentionally neglects the experiences of men, often resulting in the dismissal of similar harm against men. Nonetheless, it is important to note that by understanding the roots of this perception and its broader implications, society can begin to adopt a more balanced and inclusive approach to harm and victimization.
References
1. Graso, M., & Reynolds, T. (2024). A feminine advantage in the domain of harm: a review and path forward. Biology Letters, 20(11). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2024.0381
FEEDBACK: