Relationships between couples have a significant impact on health. Married couples’ morbidity and mortality rates are consistently lower than those of single people. But marriage itself may not be safeguarding: Frequently, unhappy partners don’t fare any better or worse than single people. Chronic negativity in a marriage is an indication that it is in trouble, and this poses both relationship and health dangers. Dyadic stress theories and studies demonstrate how unhealthy communication habits between spouses have an adverse effect on immunity. Partners are more susceptible to both acute and chronic illnesses because of these immunological concerns.
Couple Fighting
Read Also: What Adult Children Should Do and Not Do to Cope with Their Parents’ Divorce
Women are more affected than men
Interestingly, laboratory studies have revealed that, in comparison to their less hostile colleagues, couples who engaged in hostile behaviors during marital arguments produced more proinflammatory cytokines and had delayed wound healing. Additionally, worse conflict resolution and higher negative emotions have been linked to couples’ self-reported unfavorable communication practices. Examining both self-reported behaviors and discussion-based behaviors may offer distinct viewpoints that interact to predict the effects of marriage on one’s health. Research has found that although closely related, couples’ self-reported communication patterns differ from the particular activities they employ during discussions. Researchers have been inspired by this discovery to examine normal self-reported patterns and discussion-based behaviors as independent entities. Furthermore, women are more negatively impacted by marital stress than men. According to the interpersonal orientation theory, women’s identities are more centered on interpersonal relationships and interdependence. In contrast, males perceive themselves as being more autonomous and less focused on relationships.
The current study builds on earlier findings by assessing how classic self-reported communication patterns support the effects of discussion-based behaviors on spouses’ discussion evaluations, emotions, and wound healing in a sample of married couples who received blister wounds and had marital discussions. A total of 42 couples were recruited via newspaper, community, and radio ads. Exclusion criteria were health issues and drugs that interfered with immunological or endocrinological function or adversely affected wound healing. It was predicted that the elevated baseline IL-6 levels of the couples, delayed wound healing, and more negative post-discussion feelings, emotions, and evaluations would be linked with the increased use of more self-reported negative communication patterns, such as demand/withdrawal strategies and mutual discussion avoidance. If there were more self-reported good communication patterns, IL-6 levels would be lower at baseline, wounds would heal more quickly, and post-discussion feelings and evaluations would be more favorable.
Clinical significance
This and more research in the future will enable researchers to find the routes that connect unhappy marriages with poor health. A decreased cortisol response to marital conversations and quicker wound healing have been linked to couples’ positive actions.
Conclusion
The frequency with which demand/withdrawal, mutual constructive, and mutual avoidance communication patterns are used by a couple may influence how each spouse responds to marital conversations, increasing the impact on the couple’s biology, emotions, and relationships. These results contribute to our understanding of how unhealthy marriages affect the health of spouses.
References
Shrout, M. R., Renna, M. E., Madison, A. A., Malarkey, W. B., & Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K. (2023). Marital negativity’s festering wounds: The emotional, immunological, and relational toll of couples’ negative communication patterns. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 149, 105989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2022.105989
FEEDBACK:
