Contrary to the narrative that is being pushed by the mainstream that the COVID-19 virus was the result of a natural mutation and that it was transmitted to humans from bats via pangolins, Dr. Luc Montagnier the man who discovered the HIV virus back in 1983 disagrees and is saying that the virus was man-made.
Follow-Up: Luc Montagnier Insists That the Virus Came out of a Lab in Follow-Up Interview
Professor Luc Montagnier, a 2008 Nobel Prize winner for Medicine, claims that SARS-CoV-2 is a manipulated virus that was accidentally released from a laboratory in Wuhan, China. Chinese researchers are said to have used coronaviruses in their work to develop an AIDS vaccine. HIV RNA fragments are believed to have been found in the SARS-CoV-2 genome.
Read Also: Antibiotics are a Must to treat Coronavirus Says Compassionate French Doctor in This Viral Video
We knew that the Chinese version of how the coronavirus emerged was increasingly under attack, but here’s a thesis that tells a completely different story about the COVID-19 pandemic, which is already responsible for more than 110,000 deaths worldwide. According to Professor Luc Montagnier, winner of the Nobel Prize for Medicine in 2008 for “discovering” HIV as the cause of the AIDS epidemic together with Françoise Barré-Sinoussi, the SARS-CoV-2 is a virus that was manipulated and accidentally released from a laboratory in Wuhan, China, in the last quarter of 2019. According to Professor Montagnier, this laboratory, known for its work on coronaviruses, tried to use one of these viruses as a vector for HIV in the search for an AIDS vaccine!
Related: Coronavirus Screening: A 15 Minutes Test Developed by a French Company
“With my colleague, bio-mathematician Jean-Claude Perez, we carefully analyzed the description of the genome of this RNA virus,” explains Luc Montagnier, interviewed by Dr. Jean-François Lemoine for the daily podcast at Pourquoi Docteur, adding that others have already explored this avenue: Indian researchers have already tried to publish the results of the analyses that showed that this coronavirus genome contained sequences of another virus, … the HIV virus (AIDS virus), but they were forced to withdraw their findings as the pressure from the mainstream was too great.
To insert an HIV sequence into this genome requires molecular tools
In a challenging question, Dr. Jean-François Lemoine inferred that the coronavirus under investigation may have come from a patient who is otherwise infected with HIV. No, “says Luc Montagnier,” in order to insert an HIV sequence into this genome, molecular tools are needed, and that can only be done in a laboratory.
Read Also: 3 French Doctors Are Using Azithromycin With Zinc to Treat Coronavirus
According to the 2008 Nobel Prize for Medicine, a plausible explanation would be an accident in the Wuhan laboratory. He also added that the purpose of this work was the search for an AIDS vaccine.
The truth will eventually come out
In any case, this thesis, defended by Professor Luc Montagnier, has a positive turn. According to him, the altered elements of this virus are eliminated as it spreads: “Nature does not accept any molecular tinkering, it will eliminate these unnatural changes and even if nothing is done, things will get better, but unfortunately after many deaths.”
Related: Coronavirus Pandemic: Why Knowing Your HIV Status Could Save Your Life
This is enough to feed some heated debates! So much so that Professor Montagnier’s statements could also place him in the category of “conspiracy theorists”: “Conspirators are the opposite camp, hiding the truth,” he replies, without wanting to accuse anyone, but hoping that the Chinese will admit to what he believes happened in their laboratory.
To entice a confession from the Chinese he used the example of Iran which after taking full responsibility for accidentally hitting a Ukrainian plane was able to earn the respect of the global community. Hopefully, the Chinese will do the right thing he adds. “In any case, the truth always comes out, it is up to the Chinese government to take responsibility.”
Read Also: The Coronavirus Is Indeed of Natural Origin According to the Scripps Research Institute
*Disclaimer: Gilmore Health Does not Endorse The views in this Article!
Reference
FEEDBACK:
One possible reason for these HIV-like segments is that they were meant to be epitopes, or molecular flags meant to mark intruders for a vaccine to target – meaning the Wuhan Strain was built as a monster for a specific vaccine to hunt. It is mathematically possible for this to happen in nature – but only in a ten-thousand bats chained to ten-thousand Petri dishes and given until infinity sense.
thanks… part of.HIV vaccine research corroborated
The google search engine would not allow me to read this article. It showed the website unreachable. So I came to a different search engine. Everyone needs to read this from a very important researcher.
Back in march, I was speaking to friends who are in biotech at Surrey research park. They had colleagues working on covid, and there were discussions about how similar the covid19 was to hiv. If I’ve understood the theory right, some people’s bodies naturally rejects covid, which is when it recognises the virus as foreign and you get a light flu/short fever etc. So that makes you covid-neg, but in some bodies, the immune system accepts the covid (covid+pos) but it can lay dormant, depending on where it manifests itself. They were concerned that those asymptomatic may be cov+ and feared that covid was waiting for the hosts immunity to become preoccupied with another issue later on, and worryingly, infectious for a long period. Anyway 2 weeks after that it was being touted in media that hiv treatments could aid fighting covid.
Lamivudine 150 mg. anti retro-viral drug supresses HIV from becoming active
Use DuckDuckGo
Hello Holly our server was overloaded yesterday because of the huge surge in traffic so most likely you just got a server error.
No, no. Holly and Joleen think it was a conspiracy… Let’s stick with that. It was the executives at Google deliberately trying to hide this website from the public… It’s so much more exciting to think that way…
I hate to say that doesn’t surprise me, but it doesn’t. Google has been manipulating search since they started. People like the catchy name. But the catchy name doesn’t do honest searches. YAHOO search is pretty good. Microsoft’s Bing isn’t bad. I use duck duck go on Android. You can’t get away from Google on Android. I use the Firefox browser as default on all of my devices and computers. I use to use 64 bit Waterfox, but Mozilla stopped supporting it. That was a shock.
Why do people keep saying it was “accidentally released?”
I think “accidentally” is being used due to the fact that the numbers of dead in China will be in the hundreds of thousands (possibly 21 million based on cell phones that went silent in China during the quarantine). And we will only find that out when people start talking or someone hacks into the CCP computer system. You would think the Chinese government would have a cure to eliminate the huge death toll if it was a deliberate release. But then again China couldn’t give 2 sh*ts about their population and there isn’t any word about who died of the virus and were high up in the CCP.
Otis no accident. It is purposefully released.It is as good as third world war started by China secretly. The coming days will reveal more information of the Chinese clandestine work.
Even if it was. The first international flight made it a bio weapon clear and simple. Especially considering the shut down the rest of China itself. THIS WAS INTENTIONAL.
In the news it has been revealed that the US gave $3.7 million twice to Wuhan research with US providing Wuhan with samples via secret shipment Canadian Winnipeg level 4 lab.. Apparently no need for secrecy as all the bio labs in the world support each other when they request samples.
Manufacturing a virus is not as big a crime as leaking it.
Doesn’t matter how it was made. Leaking is the far bigger felony.
Vaccines are each and every one “manufactured” by man, and sometimes they make you sick or even can kill you or same one may not prevent the deadly disease it was DESIGNED to target
LEAKING IS SOMETHING THAT SHOULD NEVER HAPPEN. This is 100% . No excuse acceptable. There are literally hundreds of these labs in China and ditto US. M.I.T. area probably has 100 within a circular mile.
Like spying, extreme gross negligence is criminally liable, in fact probably death penalty in China.
Extreme gross negligence on leaking is also so nearly impossible I find it difficult to believe any virus can be “accidentally” leaking. Certainly in the U.S. we guard virus like nuclear energy, and the odds of leaks without pseunami are about the same.
Further so called “natural” viruses such as cousins MERS & SARS are actually more deadly, so why wouldn’t ‘manipulators’ make the already more deadly virus leak or just manufacture that one to spread easier.
The whole “manufacture” side is the shiny object drawing everybody’s attention from the BIG CRIME…
THE LEAKING OF A VIRUS…. No excuse for that China & W.H.O. TAKES A COMBINED LEAKING EFFORT.
in my opinion leaking is manslaughter to murder, the lab was full of a bunch of very deadly virus…
why pursue experimentation where you have to read somebody’s thoughts or intent when you have leaking
It’s like going after a murderer because he shoplifted the gun
“Every thing originally starts from USA and South Korea”
Glad to see you are still ok, Kim Jong-un, and I hope those nuclear tests catch up to you!
To me, the importance of it being manmade is that (if true) it eliminates any argument that it occurred naturally, which is China’s company line.
Any valid arguments you may have presented were lost when you went ’round the bend with constant ‘leaking’ scenario and paranoia about there being hundreds of biolabs in both U.S. and China. Then there’s your judgmental tone — premature for the info we have presently.
I’ve read that all these level 4 bio labs exchange viruses, one has to only request material. Canada has been implicated as well. Of course, when you ask what is Canada doing developing lethal viruses, they will respond, strictly defensive! From CBC Canada News : A researcher with ties to China was recently escorted out of the National Microbiology Lab in Winnipeg amid an RCMP investigation into what’s being described as a possible “policy breach.”
SARS WAS the template used. Sequence identity is greater then 90 percent. They also share the ACE-2 receptor which is the first red flag as no other known coronavirus strains target ACE-2. Not conclusive but enough here to investigate.
The Communist Chinese Party will not admit failure in anything…They refuse to be made to look bad…They and their system are perfect, well, not this time…I cannot foresee a scenario, where the Chinese government admits fault…Their brains work on the long look formula, 20, 60, 100 years down the pike…(They didn’t worry about “losing” Hong Kong to the British —“We’ll get our land back in a 150 years…”) The world will forget all about the COVID-19 pandemic, and only remember the “Recession of 2020″…Therefore why should we admit anything???…I think Dr. Montagnier, is 100% correct, but unless the entire world believes it, and can prove it, the Chinese will deny any complicity in the release of the virus, and they will absolutely refuse to admit that their lab had anything to do with it…
You are way off the mark regarding the ceding of Hong Kong by the Chinese to the British. The British did not have any goods the Chinese wanted in exchange for the silks, spices, pottery, etc they imported. The only product they could think of to pay for their imports was Opium. The Chinese objected to this trade and the first Opium War started. The British easily won and demanded and got reparations for the cost of the war. Later there was a second Opium War which the French joined in. This war was easily won and part of the settlement was the ceding of Hong Kong to the British. Read the factural history books.
Despite Prof Montagner was awarded the Nobel Prize in Medicine and Physiology in 2008, unfortunately he has a history of a bad reputation in science since then.
Just to remind, in the past he postulated some ridiculous theories, such as the theory of the ” memory of the water”.
Please have a look at what the French press tells about this ridiculous man-made coronavirus theory from Prof Montagnier:
http://www.leparisien.fr/societe/coronavirus-et-vih-pourquoi-la-theorie-du-pr-luc-montagnier-est-invraisemblable-17-04-2020-8301387.php?utm_campaign=whatsApp_partage&utm_medium=social
Please be careful to certify the veracity of the facts before publishing. If the theory about the creation of the coronavirus was true, it would imply a serious risk of a conflict between China and other nations, and consequently even a risk for a III world war, which would be a catastrophe much worse than the coronavirus pandemics.
The press has the responsibility to certify the veracity of their articles before publishing it. Please be reasonable professionals!
That is an ad hominem attack. Argue the facts not the participant.
Denis – You need to analyse the research and development of Professor Luc Montagnier’s work. He successfully ‘showed’ that human DNA, with the added marker that the DNA showed that AIDS was present, was diluted to the comparable rate of a droplet of blood in an ocean, then analysed under a professional and independent camera team as well as scientific officers.
What was analysed was that particular DNA with AIDS was recreated from the water it was dropped into. The recorded micro electrical code was then transmitted by email to a university in Italy and recreated at a first reading of over 97% accuracy and it identified the DNA held the same AIDS marker.
Also of some value to the very beginning of the humble origins of similar but crude research was the many concurrent infant school experiments in Japan. Children were asked to express bad words to one towel of rice and the second bowel was given expressions of love and encouraging words.
The extraordinary results, which were and still are repeatable, delivered black decaying rice in the one bowel and positive growth and health in the second bowel across all schools. As this took place at a simple level and across hundreds of Japanese schools many decades ago is only one of the hundreds of information flows that should encourage open minds.
Professor Luc Montagnier work is superior to the schools experiment and is magnificent and beneficial to the greater search for absolute knowledge. Remember at first a new idea is ridiculed…I am sure you know how the remainder of that expression reads…
wow what a load of techno-babble bull crap. Your first couple of sentences make little grammatical sense and even less to zero technical sense.
He did cite facts. He cited a page that illustrates Montagnier’s errors of the past:
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.leparisien.fr%2Fsociete%2Fcoronavirus-et-vih-pourquoi-la-theorie-du-pr-luc-montagnier-est-invraisemblable-17-04-2020-8301387.php%3Futm_campaign%3DwhatsApp_partage%26utm_medium%3Dsocial
Professor Montagnier, in bulk, supported the controversial theory of the “memory of water”, which would like water to keep the properties of substances with which it has been in contact , recommended to Pope John Paul II to cure speech problems with fermented papaya (with never proven benefits) or, more recently proposed to treat autism with antibiotics. In 2009, this globally recognized specialist in HIV had declared that certain good immune systems could “get rid of the virus in a few weeks” adding that “the not very balanced diet” of the African populations could explain their contamination. The content of his remarks had been invalidated by the researcher Françoise Barré-Sinoussi , who had discovered the AIDS virus with him in 1983.
More digging might make the truth more clear, but it’s not a slamdunk that COVID-19 is man made. It migth be, but the certainty with which this premise is forwarded seems excessive.
William, thanks for your reasoning…
So because there is this serious risk, which I agree there is, you prefer to keep your head in the sand instead? Stop covering for them.
Did you miss where he was not the first to offer this theory, with evidence to back it up?
this theory is not only his…I read a report early on in late January that the virus was engineered with strings from the AIDS virus and it leaked…the theory that it jumped to the Chinese eating bats from a “wet” market is suspect…they’ve been doing this for decades and now it “suddenly” transmitted itself to humans?
what I keep picking on it
(1) highly contagious, mucal targeting
(2) RNA virus type
(3) the virus does not kill (HIV, SARS-COV-2)
(4) immune system weakens, lungs (the most vulnerable part of your body), pneumonia sets in, causing organ failure (AIDS, COVID-19)
(5) co-morbidities in conjunctions with co-morbidity
Yes Montagnier is a crook and so is Robert Gallo. They invented the HIV retrovirus. It doesn’t exist. They both belong behind bars. But for the 1994 house elections of course Gallo would have been sent to prison.
thanks, Wumao.
Its a great theory that is still under study , wth other scientist enthusiasts working on it…it s a great amazing theme they are working on..is such a pitty we are living in such oscurantist times..believing we are very fan of innovations…were mainstream oficcial science is not at all…too much power and money..and not a real love for knoledge…for humanity for life …just bussinesses…take a look at the theory,begun with the work of other scientist..Jaques Benveniste ,that was attacked just for having the curiosity of develop knowledge… and died very young maybe frustrated for the mistreat..” The Memory of Water ” , iontagner continue…in the future this will be very apreciatted…and Im glad, there are still scientist like him..old schooll….So Montaigner has enough authority being a nobel prize proffesor very experienced virologist.. Media treat people like idiot, if a virologist sais something like that is not because he is guessing…so that argument to reject the word of this experienced proffesionals is just ridiculous.
What the Professor said about the genome not being able acquire the HIV fragment naturally, but that it is only possible to have that result occur from the use of laboratory procedures and equipment: “…in order to insert an HIV sequence into this genome, molecular tools are needed, and that can only be done in a laboratory”, is a simple go-no go statement, easily verified. It should be believed until counter evidence is provided.
There is tons of evidence all over the place in the form of recombination events in every single human’s genome. The idea “tinkering is impossible” is clearly wrong, since genetic engineering has been commonplace technology for decades. They write “HIV DNA fragments are believed to have been found in the SARS-CoV-2 genome.” That proves they don’t know what they’re talking about, since both are RNA viruses. Further, they have zero data, no alignment of CoV-2 and HIV.
This is clickbait BS. Avoid, block, blacklist, this website
Hey Bion, I got a great chuckle out of your mentally impoverished post. First of all, Dr. Montagnier stated that, ““Nature does not accept any molecular tinkering, it will eliminate these unnatural changes…”. This means that mutations (tinkering) are an anomaly, almost always detrimental to the species (genome) and that mutation would be, eventually, naturally eliminated. Hence, Dr. Montagnier’s comment that “…even if nothing is done, things will get better, but unfortunately after many deaths.”
Secondly, you quoted a sentence from the article and implied it was a quote from Dr. Montagnier. Pathetically, YOU couldn’t even manage to repost the sentence accurately and by the way, it’s NOT a direct quote from Montagnier. Here is the actual sentence: “HIV RNA fragments are believed to have been found in the SARS-CoV-2 genome.” Did you notice it said RNA and not DNA?
Thirdly, if you want to look at the data for proof that HIV single strands of RNA were manipulated into the SARS-CoV-2 genome, I would suggest you read the Indian scientist’s papers regarding said information which was circulating in scientific communities over a month ago before POLITICS forced them to pretend it didn’t exist.
However, I get that you’re much more intelligent than the Nobel Prize Winner for Medicine, his colleagues, the Indian scientists and so many others who have come to the same scientific hypothesis. You are either ‘that smart’ or you’re a paid Commie trying to debunk something you clearly have zero clue about with your over-the-top response to “avoid, block, blacklist this website.” I’m pretty sure I know which category you fall into.
I read the Indians were forced to withdraw their paper saying the correct methodology was not used.
to bion howard. there is additional published evidence to look at. look at the reams of viral data that came out of the 16? or 18? seized pangolians’ (lung samples ). look at the RBM of the sars cov virus samples that came out of lung sample 7 and 8. look at the RBM (receptor binding mechinism) of sars cov2 . read the referenced paper. the viral sample data has HIV listed and says ,so I think, that the pangolan sars cov RBM (a highly evolved/infectious RBM)
“somehow” replaced the bat sars cov to become (gain of function) SARS CoV2 but the pangolan sars cov with its infectious RBM did not evolve to become SARS CoV2.
Research Article CORONAVIRUS
Emergence of SARS-CoV-2 through recombination and strong purifying selection
Why are studies about chimeric bat virus creation in whuan lab being ignored?
https://www.nature.com/articles/nm.3985#ref-CR10
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966842X16300038
Why are studies about chimeric bat virus creation in whuan lab being ignored? Study names Google
A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence
Engineering Coronaviruses to Evaluate Emergence and Pathogenic Potential
Why is the story about North Carolina University sending and/ or helping with the virus in Wuhan lab not being mentioned by MSM. Officials from this university need to be called before a Senate committee for heavy questioning.
Add to your list for “heavy questioning” Charles Lieber, the Harvard professor who was being paid handsomely by the Communist Chinese government to work and was recently arrested for not disclosing this association.
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/harvard-university-professor-and-two-chinese-nationals-charged-three-separate-china-related
What media and those who are preparing very lucrative vaccines is “Corona” in its natural state cannot penetrate the human cells, not even after a bat bite or consuming infected bats is Corona infectious to humans only after a protein “spike” can the human cells absorb bat Corona and its respiratory payload. Shi Zhengli of the Wuhan Institute, also known as the “bat lady” is responsible for this added protein to the corona virus and has published no less than 4 papers on the subject. It just so happens that the quick-test kit just conveniently comes from researchers with direct involvement in the Wuhan institute have cornered the market on Corona testing.
they need the death penalty for planting this deadly virus and killing millions shot them in the head isnt good enough
Gee I guess “FOLLOW THE MONEY” is exact AGAIN
China 90% of ALL Pharma, , Globalist EGO Gates (from out of left field) is now MED EXPERT WTF
China plays GO not Chess, And truly BELIEVE the should by treated like GODS like the Dems
Professor Luc Montaigne is a human and has trials and errors, and is MOSTLY right on the highest
probable explanation esp given Xi comment 2-3 weeks ago,” We need to improve our Security at our Labs”
YES OUI,
Sean Byrne
That is an ad hominem attack. Argue the facts not the participant.
Well Gilead, Rumsfeld is in the game,
just maybe… the failed ( intentional) impeachment, as distraction, Taiwan warns WHO December HELLO
SOMEBODY WINS hey and Pandemic is just an OPPORTUNITY right?
FGS ASK THE RIGHT QUESTIONS
Hi all,
Please take time to watch below video which gives weight to the Good a doctor’s assessment that this virus is man-made….gain-of-function figures highly…
See below link removed from Face-book earlier this week
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3bXWGxhd7ic&t=41s
Earlier computer generated images showed triangular receptors and as a complete novice I thought that in itself was not natural… I believe china is a deadly enemy that must be dealt with
So now nobel prize winner are conspiracy theorists and the media are relevant one’s
This youtube is a bit rambling but you may find interesting info re: covid https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rp4wXSku8Ik&feature=emb_share
Until further notice, I will be referring to Covid19 as Xi Corona Virus. Accidental release/intentional release, naturally occurring/lab made doesn’t really matter. The actions of the Communist Chinese government AFTER the release are clearly a crime against humanity and should be considered an act of war WITH using a weapon of mass destruction.
The studies show that the virus has elements added to make it easy to spread and elements that reduce the ability of the immune system to resist the virus.
Boyle (bioweapons expert) reports that the bio-engineering work that makes the virus easy to spread was done at the University of North Carolina, and that the work that allows HIV to be added was done in an Australian facility.
He shows that Chinese scientists from the Wuhan BSL-4 biowarefare lab were present in both the UNC and Australian labs and participated in the research.
If this is true. I’m hoping that they are looking into the drug Prep. It might block it from getting into our system
The argument that the Chinese release by preconceive accident looks murky for the lab was implement by French and Americans under their constant watch. Besides, do you really think that the Chinese wanted, to kill the Western Golden hen open opportunity for business?
I agree. It is quite plausible that China was the victim of a bioweapon. This, in my view, explains Beijing’s subsequent behaviour quite well, (initial disbelief, sudden and heavy crackdown, damage control, etc…)
My experience in design of BL3 & 4 labs makes me think that protocol was not followed and something got out and infected someone at the lab. I have seen it before.
That the lab was not shut down and the infected person (s) detained is unacceptable.
The extreme contagion exhibited by this virus I believe was something cooked into it in the lab. On the other hand it is not that fatal.
Thank you for your article.
I’m not a professor, but I’ve found on web the following Italian State TV report from 5 years ago (see TGR Leonardo from 16/11/2015, Covid19 Coronavirus
from minute 5 onward https://www.rai.it/dl/RaiTV/programmi/media/ContentItem-5e3275ba-475c-4cf4-b402-1e27dc47565b.html#p=39 ) where is clearly stated that it is not prudent to coltivate artificially the Covid19. It is also stated that the laboratory is in China.
Furthermore it seems that Coronavirus is less lethal than the influences of the past years.
The National Italian Institute of Statistics reveals that in Italy in the 1st Quarter of 2020 there are 20,600 deaths (including the Covid19 victims) less than in same period of 2019.
Let’s hope that the National Statistical Institutes of other States confirm these data !!!
I got no comment but questions to the opposing views – someone convince me otherwise – and these are:
1. For how long have the residents of Wuhan been eating bats?
2. If the virus does not originate from the bats’ meat alone, what other type of animal meat combined with
that of the bats generated the virus?
3. Why is it that – not even after a bat bite or consuming infected bats is corona not infectious to humans?
Thank you Gilmore health news for posting this article. I realize that you must have suffered for bringing this info up; it is not a world that values truth but a world that values power. the truth from the mouth of a weakling is ignored, however, the same truth from the big gorilla is listened to; by then who gives a rat’s ass. That truth is already not pure. these guys should do a retraction and apologize to you; you were way ahead of their condescending views! https://healthfeedback.org/outlet/gilmore-health-news/